Is Family Cohesion a Risk or Protective Factor During Adolescent Development?
-
Judith Baer
-
School of Social Work
-
Rutgers University
-
536 George St.
-
New Brunswick, NJ 08903
-
732/932-2623
-
FAX: 732/932-8181
-
jcbaer@rci.rutgers.edu
Family cohesion is important to family functioning and levels of cohesion
have been implicated in both positive and negative outcomes. The
curvilinear hypothesis suggests that high levels of cohesion lead to enmeshment
and low levels indicate poor family support. Both result in poor
individuation and foreclosed psychosocial maturity (Barbarin, 1984; Barber,
Olsen & Shagle, 1994; Olson, Russell & Sprenkle, 1983). However,
some research has not supported the curvilinear hypothesis (Anderson, 1986;
Anderson & Gavazzi, 1990; Farrell & Barnes, 1993). However
cohesion may not be static and levels may shift across the family life
cycle.
This study investigated the shape of the family cohesion growth curve,
a test of the curvilinear vs linear hypothesis; and examined the relationship
of cohesion to adolescent deviance using cohort sequential design (N =
4677 adolescents). Results showed a good fit of the data to the model
and the different age groups converged. Fit indices were X2
=626 (df,7) p>.001, Bentler Bonett = .97; CFI = .97; RMSEA = .06 (Confidence
interval of RMSEA = .05-.06). Fit indices where the slope was estimated
yielded X2 = 285 (df, 3), Bentler-Bonett - .98, CFI =
.98, RMSEA = .06. These findings indicate that significant linear
change occurred across the period studied. The last analysis tested the
relationship between changes in the trajectory of family cohesion and deviance.
Although it was predicted that cohesion would be negatively correlated
with deviance, results showed that deviance was predicted by the changing
trends in family cohesion. The changing nature of these patterns
and the relevance of such change to family functioning have important clinical
applicability as well as major implications for sample selection especially
in cross sectional studies where the life cycle of the family may be an
important variant.
References
-
Anderson, S.A. & Gavazzi. S. M. (1990). A test of the Olson circumplex
model: Examining its curvilinear assumption and the presence of extreme
types. Family Process, 29, 309-324.
-
Anderson, S.A. (1986). Cohesion, adaptability and communication:
A test of an Olson circumplex model hypothesis. Family Relations,
35, 289-293.
-
Barbarin, O.A. (1984). Measuring basic family processes: Validity and reliability
of the Family Process Scale. Unpublished manuscript.
-
Barber, B. K., Olsen, J.E. & Shagle, S.C. (1994). Association
between parental psychological and behavioral control and youth internalized
and externalized behaviors. Child Development, 65, 1120-1136.
-
Farrell, M. P. & Barnes, G. M. (1993). Family systems and social
support: A test of the effects of cohesion and adaptability of the functioning
of parents and adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family 55,
119-132.
-
Olson, D. H., Russell, C.S. & Sprenkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex
model of marital and family systems VI: Theoretical update. Family
Process 22,69-83.