When Researchers Work For Their Subjects: A Model Of Collaboration For
Researchers Studying Consumer Directed Services And Organizations
-
Rich Beaulaurier
-
School of Social Work
-
Florida International University
-
11200 SW 8 St., ECS 460
-
Miami FL 33199
-
305-348-5876
-
FAX: 801-838-4117
-
renzbeau@fiu.edu
Consumer operated service providers (COSPs) are often founded as a reaction
against more traditional service providers. Social workers are among
the professionals whom they often perceive to be more interested in doing
things to rather than with them.
A unique study funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) awarded a contract to a COSP to conduct major study
of mental health services. This center was, staffed entirely by people
who have been treated for severe and persistent mental illness. The contract
called for subcontracts with university researchers, and research partnerships
with traditional mental health providers and professionals in their area.
Problems began to emerge almost immediately in the working alliance.
Several “landmines” emerged related to the differing orientations of researchers,
professionals and COSP staff. These orientations related to six concepts
in particular: (1) research bias, (2) control of research and service activities,
(3) fidelity to the treatment model, (4) the legitimacy of expertise, (5)
theoretical underpinnings of the service provided, and (6) what were constituted
positive outcomes of services.
“Landmines” were (a) generally invisible to researchers and consumers
until trod upon and (b) often caused considerable, sometimes irreparable,
damage once detonated. Over time, however, both researchers and researchers
gained considerable insight into the nature of these pitfalls and how to
avoid them. This paper, which is itself a collaborative effort between
COSP staff and university researchers will present a model of collaboration
designed to maximize the effectiveness of researchers working for, and
on behalf of, consumer directed programs. Examples of how problems came
about, and how they were eventually resolved will be examined. The resulting
model is based on a collaborative approach aimed at aiding researchers
in developing more productive and beneficial partnerships and working arrangements
with consumer run and directed organizations and programs.
REFERENCES
-
Ansello, E. F., & Eustis, N. N. (1992). [Eds.]. Special Issue: Aging
and Disability. Gerontologist, 16(1), entire issue.
-
Beaulaurier, R. L., & Taylor, S. H. (2000). Challenges and inconsistencies
in providing effective advocacy for disabled people in today's health
services environment: An exploratory descriptive study. SCI Psychosocial
Process, 13(3).
-
Beaulaurier, R. L., & Taylor, S. H. (2001). Dispelling fears about
aging with a disability: Lessons from the disability rights community.
Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 35(2).
-
DeJong, G. (1981). Environmental Accessibility and Independent Living Outcomes:
Directions for Disability Policy and Research. East Lancing, MI: University
Center for International Rehabilitation, Michigan State University.
-
Kailes, J. I. (1988). Putting Advocacy Rhetoric into Practice: The Role
of the Independent Living Center. Houston, TX: Independent Living Research
Utilization.
-
Mackelprang, R. W., & Salsgiver, R. O. (1996). People with disabilities
and social work: Historical and contemporary issues. Social Work, 41(1),
7-14.
-
Roberts, E. V. (1989). A History of the Independent Living Movement: A
Founder's Perspective. In B. W. F. Heller, Louis M.; Zegens, Leonard S.
(Ed.), Psychosocial Interventions with Physically Disabled Persons (pp.
231-244). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
-
Tower, K. D. (1994). Consumer-centered social work practice: Restoring
client self-determination. Social Work, 39(2), 191-196.
-
Wehmeyer, M. (1997). Self-determination as an educational outcome: A definitional
framework and implications for intervention. Journal of developmental and
physical disabilities, 9(3), 175-209.
-
Wilk, R. J. (1994). Are the rights of people with mental illness still
important? Social Work, 39(2), 167-175.
-
Zola, I. K. (1979). Helping one another: A speculative history of the self
help movement. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60, 452-456.
-
Zola, I. K. (1983). Toward independent living: Goals and dilemmas. In N.
M. Crewe & I. K. Zola (Eds.), Independent Living for Physically Disabled
People (pp. 344-356). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.